Reblog with update: Orlando – A View From Britain

I hadn’t planned on re-blogging any more previous posts at present, but I have just had a reminder about this one, from a year ago today. Whilst this was written as a response to the mass shooting at the Pulse nightclub in Orlando, it carries a wider message.

Sadly, that message is no less relevant today. Yesterday in the US saw the widely publicised shooting of Republican politician Steve Scalise and several others while they were playing baseball. It also saw the less widely publicised killing of three UPS workers in San Francisco by a colleague, who then committed suicide. This morning, I saw this on the Vox Facebook page:

‘In December 2012, a gunman walked into Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, and killed 20 children, six adults, and himself. Since then, there have been at least 1,399 mass shootings, with at least 1,564 people killed and 5,515 wounded.’

These statistics are horrific, especially as a change in the law could help to reduce them. Here in the UK we have recently had the suicide bombing in Manchester, and two terrorist attacks by fanatical murderers armed with vehicles and knives. The loss of life and injuries caused by these outrages is awful, but I can’t help but think that, had the perpetrators had the easy access to guns that they would have enjoyed in the States, the death tolls would have been much higher. Yet the US President took to Twitter to criticise the Mayor of London for his response to the events, using his usual technique of a very selective grasping of the wrong end of the stick. He then went on to mock us for our gun laws. You really still don’t get it, America, do you? Evil will, I fear, always exist in our world. But making it harder for those people to access weapons of mass murder seems to me to be a no brainer. But, somehow, I think this message falls on deaf ears amongst those in a position to do something about it. That, to a non-American, is shameful.

Take It Easy

What happened in Pulse bar in Orlando on Saturday night was shocking, horrific, and utterly terrifying for anyone caught up in it. I can only write about it on the basis of the information I have been given by the British media, which may or may not be correct, but this information has got me thinking.

My heart goes out to the victims and their families. I cannot begin to comprehend the horror of being involved in such an atrocity. From a European perspective the obvious initial reaction was that as the murderer was called Omar Mateen this was likely to be another one-man terrorism act. Stereotypes, huh? We learned that shortly before he went out to kill people he had made some phone calls claiming allegiance to Islamic State. That just added to the image. But in the past few days it has emerged that he had also claimed…

View original post 933 more words


6 thoughts on “Reblog with update: Orlando – A View From Britain

  1. Yeah, Clive, the message seems so obvious but too many vested interests, and influential vested interests at that, want things to stay the way they are. Look at the gun lobbyists over there, strutting up and down the White House corridors in their designer cowboy boots — “Mr Bannon will ya now, boys, get them big dollars ready!”
    Is it too simplistic to make the connection between the easy availability of guns and all the killings and maimings that have stemmed from that, and the notion of the right to carry arms being ingrained in the American psyche from watching too many John Wayne movies, and all those comic book depictions of how America was won?
    How sick is the very notion of powerful arms manufacturers being allowed to sell toys that dismember and destroy all over the world? And garner trillions of dollars from the US government to come up with ever more elaborate and vicious weapons of mass destruction that are supposedly only there to stop the other guy firing his?
    If even one of the thousands of these things stocked up were actually fired it would be Hiroshima and Nagasaki to the power of who dares to ponder.
    Like you say, Clive, if the political will were there, so many lives would immediately be spared with the stroke of a presidential pen. Again, too simplistic.
    Well done

    Liked by 1 person

    • Thanks Enda. It may seem a simplistic answer, but if the means to kill were removed life there would be much safer. But, as you say, there are powerful vested interests which will, I fear, always prevent that happening.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. As much as we’d rather think about more positive things, it is important to keep reminding ourselves of the horrific incidents which have taken so many lives and caused so much fear. I agree, having guns so readily available is madness. But I’m afraid the US is still not ready to abandon that policy. Limiting gun availability certainly won’t happen with this President in charge.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Sadly, it would take a very strong President to take on the NRA and big business interests. No Republican would ever do it, least of all the incumbent moron. But there have been many Democrat Presidents and they haven’t done anything to effect change. Gun ownership is engrained in their culture, and I fear it will never change.


Please leave a reply, I'd like to know what you think

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.