2020 Hindsight

As has become my habit I’m using the entrance of a new year to take stock of how my blog performed last year. 2020 was, of course, the weirdest year that most of us can probably remember – certainly in my 67 years on the planet – and there is something comforting in reflecting on a trivial subject like a blog, amidst all that has been happening around us. This may be a little self-indulgent on my part, but I justify it to myself by believing that newer readers won’t have seen some of the posts I’ll be mentioning, and might otherwise be distraught to have missed out (as if!).

Back in the days when I first began blogging WordPress used to provide us with an annual review of our blogs, which gave all the details and stats we could possibly want to know. They have long since stopped doing that and I now have to rely on my own analysis – so beware of potential errors!

The basic stats are fairly easy to judge – I just look at the numbers. In those terms, 2020 was my most successful year since 2015, and December 2020 was my best month since October 2015. In fact, every month in 2020 was better than the corresponding month in 2019. Compared with 2019, there were 72% more page views, 188% more likes, 244% more comments, and an overall increase of 30% in visitor numbers. These visitors were from exactly 100 different countries: 44% from the US, 27% from the UK, then 5% from India, with the remaining 24% being shared between the other 97 countries, 19 of which had just the one view. It must have been something I said. Either that or I’m just not popular in Burundi. In all I posted 112 times in 2020, my highest ever total: it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to work out that more posts equals more views, does it!

Judging the popularity of posts isn’t quite so simple. It would be great if WordPress gave me detailed viewing stats for every post, but they don’t. Maybe it is because I only have their free plan, but they lump together 25% of my page views into a category of “Home Page/Archives,” which is next to useless, really. Any analysis of the posts which were read the most often is therefore doomed to failure so I have, as before, fallen back on rating ‘success’ by the number of likes each post was given. I know that this is unsatisfactory, but for me it is preferable to not counting 25% of the votes.

On the number of likes, last year was a bit of an oddity. For the first time that I can remember, there wasn’t one post which stood out way ahead from the others: in fact, there was only a difference of ten likes between 1st and 10th in the rankings. Having said that, I have been reminded of a favourite old Snoopy cartoon:

I began collecting data for this post last weekend, since when there have been additional likes affecting five positions in my top ten, including the #1. So, before there are any more last minute changes here is my countdown of last year, from #10 to #1:

=9️⃣  Tuesday Tunes 13: Shopping

=9️⃣   Glastonbury For Geriatrics

=7️⃣   Tuesday Tunes 21: Growing Up

=7️⃣   Tuesday Tunes 30: Sixties USA

6️⃣   Tuesday Tunes 29: More Sixties

5️⃣   RIP Peter Green

4️⃣   Tuesday Tunes 22: Disappointment


And the top three:

3️⃣   That Was The Year That Was

2️⃣  Tuesday Tunes 20: Lockdown Music – Part 2

1️⃣   World Mental Health Day 2020

I began the Tuesday Tunes series on 24 March, the day after our Prime Minister had placed us into Lockdown 1, as it has since become known, having since been joined by its stablemates Lockdown 2 (November) and Lockdown 3, which began last Monday. As with everything our government does, there were elements of confusion around it: on Monday the PM told us that it would last for at least six weeks, but on Tuesday a senior cabinet minister told us it would last until March. Then, yesterday, the PM said it could last until April. Talk about hedging your bets! Clarity is not a word I’d associate with this lot. Incompetence, ineptitude and corruption perhaps, but not clarity. I hadn’t intended Tuesday Tunes to become a series, but was prompted to do so by a comment suggesting I should, and it kind of grew from there. It gave me a regular reason for at least one post each week, and there was bugger all else that I could do, wasn’t there? Looking back on them, I began each one with my own take on the situation here, usually comprising jibes at the incompetence, ineptitude etc of our government, and then began to theme them: many of the early posts related to a word that had been in the news that week. I started with just two songs per week, but gradually expanded until six tunes became more the norm: let’s face it, you haven’t got anything better to do either, have you? It is no surprise to me that six of last year’s top ten are from this series, and two of the other four are also music-related.

The two remaining posts are worthy of mention. At #3 was the equivalent of this post, which gives you a look back over my blogging 2019, with links to a number of posts from that year. As many of you have joined me since then – 255 during 2020 – you probably won’t have seen these, so do feel free to meander through the detritus of previous years. But the thing that pleases me most is that, for the third year running, my top post has been the one I wrote to mark World Mental Health Day, on 10 October. Given the amount of music I have shared with you, you would be forgiven for forgetting – or not knowing – why I started this in the first place, and it is good for me to be reminded that I need to continue to write about mental health issues, perhaps more often than I did last year. Last year’s top three are now at numbers 6, 7 and 8 on my all time list – if you look, you’ll see that my top six posts ever are all on mental health topics, which is gratifying for me.

Another new feature for me last year was to convert my Christmas posts into a daily Advent Calendar. Together with my monthly review on 30 November, this meant a 26 day streak of posts from me, which is almost unheard of. Thank you to everyone who lasted the course! None of those posts were close to the top ten, but I had a lot of fun doing them, and it felt like they were well received. So maybe I’ll do it again…

Before I go, I’d like to mention the real oddity of last year’s stats. In my review of 2019 I said this

“I’ll leave you with my own favourite post from last year. It was another of my musical ones but with a difference: its main aim was to show how talented musicians can be found on YouTube amongst all the dross on the site. I deliberately gave the post a slightly ambiguous title and, as you can see from the comments, a couple of people admitted to being drawn in by it. As I said to one of them, it was good to know that my MBA in Marketing (1980!) was still of some value, and who wouldn’t want to find out what Under The Covers was about? That was far from being the most ‘liked’ post, but is probably the one from which I derived most pleasure in writing.”

Since then, that post has for some reason developed a life of its own. It was single-handedly responsible for 9% of my total site views last year, and I marked its birthday by sharing it again in 2020. If you haven’t read Under The Covers do take a look, and if anyone can tell me why it has been viewed so often I’d love to know.

My own personal favourite post from last year, which didn’t appear in the top ten, is Birthday Celebrations, in which I revisited a post written for my 60th birthday, updated and compared with how we did it in 2020. It features a little star who wasn’t born in 2013, who is very dear to my heart.

I should probably close now, but before I do I’d like to offer my thanks to each and every one of you who has contributed, whether that be by reading, liking or commenting on any of my posts. Some of you are regulars, others less so, but I value the support you all give to my blog. It’s good to know that there are people out there beyond my screen and keyboard, and I value our interactions – as indeed I do when I read, like and comment on your blogs too. We’re all in this together, folks 😊


42 thoughts on “2020 Hindsight

    • Thanks, Yvette. I think it more likely that the Burundi visitor, like the other 18 who only landed once from their country, was probably a disappointed customer misled by the ‘Under The Covers’ title 😂

      Sharing videos is easy, and is probably how you do it too. If I’m on the iPad there is a ‘Share’ option which gives you a link to the video – helpful for Facebook but not so much for a blog post. If I’m on my MacBook I get two options, either the same link or an ‘embed’ choice. Then just copy the embed code and paste it into the post. Clearly there’s no need to be paying for a plan to do that, and I guess that’s how you do it too?

      Liked by 1 person

      • Well I pay for a premium plan – but not for the video feature ((although I was under the impression they blocked videos on the free plan- maybe that changed with the Google partnership – because I think that was when they stopped the stats and made WordPress staffers work more anonymous – so no more staff names used and bio photos as they host challenges – all behind the curtains now)

        I like the premium plan for more space and originally it included the blog domain – that is now separate but the plan is not that much and it removes adds.

        Liked by 1 person

      • I’ve never felt I needed to pay. I first shared a video in 2013 and had no difficulties, and have carried on since then. I can imagine that your photos take up a lot of space, but I don’t have that problem. The occasional ad has never bothered me, though I don’t see any when I look at my own page! Horses for courses, I guess…

        Liked by 1 person

  1. I’ve been blogging for less than two years, but I’m glad to have found your blog. I always look forward to Tuesday Tunes, and your musical knowledge is far superior to mine. Blogging, for me, is the opportunity to exchange thoughts and words across the globe. Yes, I do pay attention to those stats.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Hey Pete and Clive – wanted to piggy back in what Pete said about clives msucucao knowledge – because yes it is a strength of his
      But I find the real charm of his music posts is that very special Clive-style refleting that offers his personal connection to the music (if any) and other tidbits with the music info – but never verbose and with such flow.
      It really is a Clive-style kind of unique approach to writing about music.
      Okay – wishing you both a great day

      Liked by 1 person

      • Thank you so much, Yvette, that is so kind of you. As I said to Pete recently, I try to put in chart positions and any history I come across to give some context, and if I have a story to tell and can talk about myself so much the better!

        Btw what’s msucucao? It sounds like musical chocolate!

        Thanks for your good wishes. As it is 11.58pm here I’m going to enjoy those last two minutes of today 😂

        Liked by 1 person

      • Oh Clive – I think we have a new word on our hands –
        Was supposed to be “musical”
        It does sound like music chocolate or some special
        Musical drink!
        maybe it can be the term for the Clive-style kf music exploring –
        msucucao: the term for exploring music according to genre, historical context and occasional statistics while also adding the author’s personal connection to the music (if any). msucucao, where the root “msuc” is derived from music and the cucaco “from curating a blog post at take it easy blog with Clive”
        How is that?

        Liked by 1 person

  2. I’m glad you had such a good bogging year. I remember the WordPress stats well and the little diagram showing where followers came from or was it just comments? I like blogs with music and I see you play quite a bit of 60’s which I shall enjoy. Funny that I found you through an American blog. but I’m delighted that I did.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Thank you, David, and for following too. Those WordPress stats are helpful – up to a point! Lots of music here, and the 60s and 70s do feature often. I’m very glad I found you too – we can thank Jill for that 😊

      Liked by 1 person

    • I chose the title deliberately! I wrote the piece yesterday and it included a couple of jibes at Trump. I took them out this morning: it just didn’t seem right to leave them in, especially after people died because of him.

      Liked by 1 person

Please leave a reply, I'd like to know what you think

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.